I tried using redscale film the other day (made it by putting the film into another canister backwards pssch why would I bother buying it when I had a spare roll lying around?).
The problem was that I've never used redscale before and I didn't expose it properly and got confused about it. I expected them to come out red-y/orange-y/yellow-y as many examples I'd seen.
As I said before I'm not sure if I should have under or over exposed and because i'm an idiot I didn't write down my exposures/what ISO I shot at etc I'm going to have to do another trial to get it right. Amy you're a pleb...
These three images are all the same just edited slightly differently in photoshop. unsure if I should bother with them or just put them in a folder called 'failures'
So this one is the original redscale image, as you can see the red came through as expected but clearly the exposure wasn't right as you can't see much detail.
I went and turned the image black and white and lo and behold a lot more detail was revealed, I guess the colour distracts you eyes from the tone of an image so you miss detail for colour (actually I remember learning about that in biology in your eye you have cone cells and rod cells cone cells are more sensitive to colour you have ones that are sensitive red, green and blue light and you need a lot more light to enter your eye to see in colour, and rod cells are more sensitive to any kind of light and work in low light to distinguish between light and dark I think. did that even make any sense?)
and this last image was just a bit of fun, playing around to see if i could get detail out but with colours, it worked(ish) but I lost the distinctive redness and there was a lot more noticeable noise than the black and white version.
©Amy Scott-Pillow all rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment